CREEPINGNET'S WORLD
ORPHANED MACS
Doing The Planet a Service By Recruiting them to the OpenSource Army!
Apple Computer was founded in 1978 by Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs and got their claim to fame with their platform known as the "Macintosh" - a Motorola 68000 based PC with a Graphical user Interface (GUI) released in 1984 with much fanfare. This became the IBM PC's major competitor in the 1980's but their products were stifled a bit by having a "Closed Architecture" (basically, unlike the PC, you could not just buy a few books and program for it, you had to purchase a development kit from Apple after passing some tests and meeting some compliance regulations made up by the company), and limited games due to what I like to call "Intellectual Posers" and "Education Elitists" who felt that computer games should be "Educational" largely stifled the market for the Apple computer.

Why I'm laying down this background information is that it's important to understand that Apple being a dominant force on the PC Market after the 1980's is a more recent thing than some people think. Oh sure, there are some Apple die-hards who think that the post-old-world Macintosh - ie the "Power Macintosh" was a smash hit product. Truth was, Apple almost went under during the 1990's and early 2000's. JObs was next to leave Apple to form NexStep in 1987, and then Apple faltered a bit with their restrictive rules on software, and limiting access of major business applications on their hardware. For awhile, they were in direct competition with Microsoft/IBM.

Historically, Apple has changed Architecture several times, there's the "Old World Macs" (ie Motorola 6800x based machines) which were typically black and white AIO devices with high resolution CRTs built in running system software 1-6.x.x. The "Old World" Macs can be equated to a IBM PC XT or IBM PC AT (8088-80286) machines, while the late era devices (68030 and 68040) were equal to the 386/486 machines of the later DOS PC era. Then came the "Power Macintosh" era which started with the Power Macintosh 6000/7000/8000/9000 series machines (I've owned four myself) which were the equivalent to the PEntium 1/2/3/4 machines - ending with the G3 era in the early 2000s. The G3 era saw a swap of codebase for Mac OS from Apple's proprietary software code, to a Unix-based design based on Debian (IIRC) Linux somewhat - and got renamed Mac OSX. In the mid 2000's - around 2005, Apple changed from IBM PowerPC Silicon (funny huh) to regular Intel Silicon - ie Core 2 Duo/Quad and Core I-series stuff - which leads us to these "Orphaned" and (somewhat) "Modern" Macintosh machines that are now hitting the third hand market in droves. When Apple went to Intel silicon, they became very popular for awhile, almost as popular as the PC.

The reason for this popularity is in the 2000's, Apple had a hit Mp3 player called the "iPod" - this later was combined with the cellular phone to create now the most popular (and expensive) cell phone format - the iPhone, which then was made bigger into a tablet and called the "iPad" - these products indirectly attracted the computer-using user-base to Apple as well. Additionally, some more people bought Apple products because they felt they could use the "Best of Both Worlds" using utilities such as Bootcamp to run Windows and Apple on the same machine - without having to learn a new open-source operating system (IMHO shooting themselves in the foot in the end). The result now with apple moving to the M1 silicon, a large cross-section of Intel based Macs going for peanuts at your local thrift shop or garage sale.
The Lifecycle of Apple Products - According to Apple at Least
To understand the hardware from this standpoint, we have to understand Apple sees you - the end user - very differently than a PC company does. They see you as sort of a member of an exclusive club who "Buys in" the "rights" to use "their" hardware. A big part of it being that Apple has been a notorious opponent to "Right to Repair" and has alienated parts of their userbase thereof, especially through the switchover to the new hardware platform. That said, you pay a premium for it, with products costing at least 0.5x to 3x as much as a comparable PC product. That said though, the hardware you pay for is very high quality, and very well made. 5-7 years after you purchase said expensive device though, you are expected to upgrade to the latest Apple device version to continue using their software.

What apple does right I see, is they provide the operating system (MacOS) free of charge to anyone with their hardware - up to the last supported version. Another thing they do right is they DO make some really good hardware. Some of their lower end products have performance comparable to a mid-tier Enterprise product from a reputable PC manufacturer. Like to compare Dell, a Dell Inspiron PALES Compared to a Macbook stnadard model that competes with it, but a Macbook STandard can be EASILY Compared to a comparable Dell Latitude Enterprise-class product.

What they do that's not so favorable, is who "closed" their hardware still is, evne the intel hardware. Some issues I've run into include certain devices not working as expected (such as sound via internal speakers on my Late 2015 iMac 21.5" running Linux Mint), or upgradablity (Same computer requires about $25-50 of special "Apple" Parts to do a hard drive upgrade from a 5400rpm spinning drive to a 512GB SSD). Typically, the newer Mac, the more difficulties you might have, as Apple is trying very hard to retain their profitability by making sure that their hardware does not hit the 3rd hand market. They want you to "buy in" to that first paragraph I mentioned, and continue to make up the difference by trading your previous Mac product to be recycled up to another one. But not everyone wants to stay with Apple, so devices fall through the cracks - that's where guys like me come in!


What Generations of Macintosh Should You Take On?
My rule of thumb for a daily-driver open source Macintosh is anything under 15 years old is game, while under 10 years old is preferrable. Right now That leaves this list of Macintosh machines from 2010-present that I would consider using as a OpenSource based Macintosh based solution.....and some known issues as I find them.
Model CPU RAM RAM
UPG?
HDD
UPG?
Known Issues?
MacMini 4.1 (late 2010) 2.6GHz Core 2 Duo P6800 2GB PC3L SODIMM Yes, up to 16GB Yes, Std SATA No known issues. However, it's older so it might be better for light duty use in my personal experience (I own one of these)
iMac 21.5" (Late 2015) 1.6GHz Core i5 8GB DDR3 No, Soldered to MB Yes, but Requires Special Hardware/Toolkit to access drive (Remove Screen) Has some problems with Linux Mint using the external speaker after installation

To Mac or Linux - that is the Question?
Currently as it stands, the Mini runs Linux while the iMac I have runs Mac OSX Monterey 12. The reason I chose this is because of the issues and performance difficulties I had with the iMAC using Linux were outweighed by a proper Macintosh install. ALso, the Spindle Drive limits it, and I'm not quite ready to start pulling the screen off and fighting with adhesives to swap the 1TB Spindle wiht a 512GB SSD I have laying around.